|
|
|
| | |
What's Wrong With Leghold Traps?? · · ·
· All Trapping Laws are Self-Regulated by the Trapper
· Save Wildlife and Reduce Unnecessary Pain and Suffering In the U.S. alone, more than 4 million animals a year are trapped and killed for profit and "recreation." Millions more are trapped and killed in predator and "nuisance" wildlife control programs. These figures do not include the millions of non-target animals killed each year in traps set for other species. · Body-gripping Traps Are Cruel and Indiscriminate Body-gripping traps -- which include leghold traps, strangulation neck snares, and Conibear kill-traps -- are notoriously cruel and indiscriminate. If not killed outright by such traps, captured animals can suffer severe physical injury, psychological trauma, dehydration, exposure to severe weather, and predation by other animals. Most body-gripping traps will capture any animal that triggers them, including threatened and endangered species, raptors, and domestic dogs and cats. · The Majority of Americans and Veterinary Associations Oppose Leghold Traps
· The Use of Cruel Traps Is Unnecessary Trapping with body-gripping traps for "wildlife management" or disease control purposes is often ineffective and sometimes counterproductive because of the random nature of traps. There are other humane alternative live-capture devices such as box, cage, and culvert traps that can be used for these purposes. · 90 Countries Have Banned the Leghold Trap Although 90 nations have banned the leghold trap, only eight U.S. states have banned or severely restricted its use. As a result of public pressure, all 15-member nations of the European Union banned the leghold trap in 1995. More and more countries recognize the inherent cruelty of leghold traps and other body-gripping devices and seek research into humane capture alternatives. View Images Of Trapped Animals
|